I happened upon a table of CDVs at the fleamarket this weekend. At 50 cents each, they were just the right price for my exceedingly light purse of late. Of the couple hundred images I flipped through, there were only three from the early to mid 1860s. I am happy to share them with you.
This first image shows us wonderfully clean lines. I think she had this image taken possibly in 64 or 65 based on the slightly raised collar and the large box pleats in her skirt.
This is a good image to help someone understand the structure of the shoulder for this time. Her striped fabric help show how the front bodice panel is cut. The bit of trim she used accents the slightly dropped armscye position. We also see a basic coat sleeve. She, or her dress maker, chose to position the upper portion of the coat sleeve on the grain, allowing the elbow and lower sleeve to fall somewhat across the grain. Her cuffs or possibly undersleeve peak out of her sleeve that lands at least an inch above her wrist. (I’ll admit, I am one who fusses with my sleeve lengths once the dress is made.
I can’t help but notice her buttons, or actually the position of one particular button. As a busty woman, I find that mid-bust button essential. You can even see how that button, her 5th one down, has more pull on it that those above. I’m curios about her belt. It appears to me to be self fabric with the stripes running horizontally. This may be an illusion of shadows. But, either way, take a look at the closure. To me that looks like a fabric “loop” for the lack of a better word, which the belt slides through. You can also clearly see the braid on her hem. 
Next we have a woman with similarly simply kept, neat hair. This image has several neat tid-bits to ponder. I really want to take her bow off to see her full neckline. I can not quite tell if the white is a single piece or a tucker and collar separately. On the left side of her neck, I want to say collar because it looks like the white goes over the dark of the dress. On the opposite side, it looks like the dress is going over the white. I would love to know what other see. Now, that bow. I want to place this image as transitioning from the 50s into the 60s because of the V of the bodice. The thing is, that bow, the size of that bow just doesnt’ fit for that timing because I see the bows this size coming later. The other thing about the bow is against that little pin, the fabric seems rather wrinkled to me.
I do think this image is nice timing for those of us who have recently or are just now getting out our clothes after a long running winter, to find things are a bit….. snug. The lower half of her bodice is just that. The fabric is taught against her corset with tension lines/wrinkles running horizontally through her whole ribcage. A very nice, reaffirming thing to see.
Now look at her belt. Do you see how she’s closed this ribbon belt with a simple pin? Nice.
Looking at her sleeves, we see she has more of a drop in her armscye than the woman above. The eye is pulled further down by her sleeve cap. This cap is quite deep, appearing to go halfway to her elbow, and trimmed with velvet. The velvet is used again at her cuff along with what may be two or three buttons. This, too is a coat sleeve construction, with a more fitted wrist. 
This was the first image in my ‘yes’ pile. Look at that expression! She looks so happy to have her photo taken. I wonder what this kid was like because neat and pressed don’t shine through in this image, more of slightly, though naturally dishevelled. Her neckline is a bit askew, her skirt has wrinkles and she looks like she is putting in every effort to stand still for the camera. For me, this image has life. Now, as far as her clothing. I don’t know as much about children’s clothing. I see a neat trim or tucker around her open neckline. What I’ve heard called an ‘infant bodice’. Her shoulders look slightly dropped, with simple sleeves. The trim on her skirt looks like a trio of stripes that could be another fabric or ribbon. Her skirts do seem petticoat full. I’m having trouble seeing the feet area because of some markings on the image itself and something I think is behind her. (Don’t crush my interpretation of her expression saying that is a stand to aid her in her pose and the expression is one of irritation.) She does look like she’s wearing boots. 



















